jump to navigation

Virgin Mobile ad concept July 9, 2009

Posted by प्रवीण in Advertising.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

My ad concept for Virgin mobile handsets.

A few weeks back MyPopkorn ran a competition for creating print/TV commercials for 3 brands: Virgin mobiles, Sprite and Uniquely Singapore. They claimed that they had a respected panel of judges, promised huge monetary/non-monetary rewards for winners and actually showed a ray of hope to many budding copywriters and ad-makers. The competition received a huge response, around 3000 entries and then, simply vanished without a trace. The creative awards page on MyPopkorn now doesn’t exist. Google doesn’t show any result about who won this, or whether even the judgment actually took place. Now I doubt if this all was just a scam to promote their website and attract some free traffic/free publicity for their site.

Anyways, here is what I created for Virgin mobile handset ads. Please give your opinion in the comments.

Virgin-1

Virgin-2

Pleasing the health-conscious customer March 10, 2009

Posted by प्रवीण in Business.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
3 comments

The modern Indian consumer is increasingly turning health-freak and demands for products that are healthy and low fat. This post deals with what the companies ‘should’ and ‘should not’ do to deal with this change.

The Indian food & beverages industry is witnessing a new change in consumer preference these days: Increase in the demand of “healthy” food. The consumer is slowly shifting from regular bread to “brown bread”, from normal tea to “green tea” and from chocolates to “nutrition bars”.

This is a natural and expected phenomena in any growing economy. With economic growth comes easy money, which leads to bad food habits and lousy lifestyle, which causes obesity and poor health, which in turn makes people more health-conscious. They try to change their lifestyle and their eating habits, although in most of the cases the change is cosmetic. They enroll for a gym where they never go, they wait for the new year to make a resolution to quit smoking which they never quit; and since they can’t cut their junk food intake (that would be too difficult), they search for junk food which is “low calories”, “no fat” and “zero cholesterol”. Moreover, they don’t mind paying a little extra for this “healthier” product.

This trend, though causing a negative impact on the regular F&B products, creates a whole new market for the so called “healthy” products. Now it’s up to the companies as to how they plan to cope with this change (and possibly make a profit from this). We have four interesting case studies in this regard and each of these companies followed a different strategy.

Case 1: Nestle (Maggi Noodles)

2-min-maggiNoodles are a favorite among kids and since parents are always against anything that’s their kid’s favorite, they oppose noodles too. In this case the reason is that noodles are made of white refined wheat flour (maida), which is low in nutritional value and is less fibrous.

Nestle, leader in the noodles market with its brand Maggi, knew this too well. So they came up with a range of new products: Maggi Vegetable Atta noodles, Maggi Daal Atta Noodles, Maggi Rice Noodles etc. which they claim is made from whole grain wheat flour and real vegetables. This is a good example of how companies can change their product recipe to satisfy the health-aware consumer.

Case 2: Pepsico (Tropicana)

tropicanaPepsi, a leading brand in aerated soft drinks market, has been doing well in India. But now, the modern health-conscious consumer, aware of the harmful ingredients of the soft drinks, is looking for some healthier alternatives, like fruit juices, lassi etc.

So Pepsico, as in the example of Nestle, could have thought of either making its Pepsi “healthy”, or launching Pepsi fruit juices. As for the first option, not much can be done (Diet Pepsi is already there in the market and doing reasonably good), Pepsico decided to go with the second option, but it knew that for the consumers, Pepsi is synonymous with soft drinks and in turn, synonymous with ‘junk’. So they could reject even the fruit juices that are sold with the name ‘Pepsi’. So Pepsico came up with a different strategy, they created a new brand altogether, called Tropicana, for their fruit juice offerings. On the packets of Tropicana juices, one can not find the slightest hint of its association with Pepsi, except for a small place where it says: Marketed by Pepsico. This example shows that if the brand name itself has become too associated with the junk food, company should consider launching a new brand for the healthier product range.

(Coca-Cola, facing the same challenge, has been a bit reluctant and in place of creating a whole new brand with different juice offerings, they just launched an orange juice called Minute Maid along with its earlier offering of Maaza mango drink.)

Case 3: KMF Nandini (Good Life)

goodlifeThe case of Karnataka Cooperative Milk Producers’ Federation Limited  (KMF) is very interesting and unique. KMF already had two varieties of its milk product ‘Good Life’: Good Life, which is regular pure milk, and Good Life Slim, which is homogenized, skimmed milk. Since they use the skimmed cream to make other milk products, they were selling Slim at a price Re.1 lower than Good Life.

But when KMF saw the shift in consumer preference and that all other companies were pricing their healthier, low fat products higher than the regular ones, they also decided to follow suit and they interchanged the pricing of Good Life and Slim i.e. now Good Life became Re.1 cheaper than Slim. This move ended up in a fiasco and was totally rejected by the consumers. While Good life consumers rejoiced that they were getting it for a lesser price, Slim consumers felt cheated because they were paying extra for the same product. So they moved to other brands.

slimKMF authorities then realized their mistake, and confused about what to do, they made the prices equal. So now Good Life and Slim both sell at the same rate. This example shows that things become a lot more complex and sensitive when you already have a “healthier” option but wrongly priced. Just increasing the price without any value addition will most likely backfire. You better launch a new product or do some value addition to the existing product to justify the price hike.

Case 4: Domino’s Pizza

dominosPizza has been traditionally considered to be one of the most unhealthy junk foods.  Domino’s, being the largest pizza company in India, will be most affected by this change in consumer preference. So Domino’s should come up with some variety of low fat, low calories pizza or consider selling some other low fat products complimentary to its product range. But it turns out that Domino’s is either unaware of this change, or has decided to completely ignore it, because so far it has done nothing. In fact, it is doing the exact opposite: Domino’s recently launched Cheese Burst pizza, containing extra amount of high saturated fat cheese. Only time will tell whether they were right in doing so or I was in criticizing them for it.

In these four cases we found some valuable business lessons about how to retain your customers who are increasingly turning health-freak:

  • If you can tweak your existing product recipe to make it healthy, do so. It is the easiest way out. Plus you can charge extra for this tweaking.
  • If it is almost impossible to make your product healthier and consumers are shifting to some other product, consider selling that other product yourself.
  • If your brand name has become too associated with unhealthy products, think of launching a new brand for your healthier product range.
  • If you already have a healthy product offering but priced wrongly, just promote it. Don’t change the pricing without any justification.
  • Ignoring the change (or worse, resisting the change) will not help. History shows that companies who adapted to the change thrived and those who resisted it faded into oblivion.

DELL: Take Your Own Path? January 20, 2009

Posted by प्रवीण in Advertising.
Tags: , , , , ,
2 comments

Some interesting things about Dell’s recent campaign “Take Your Own Path” that itself did not take its own path.

Dell started its first ever campaign in India to attract SMB owners with a tag line: Take Your Own Path. It uses real life SMB owners to endorse Dell products and here these ‘real life heroes’ talk about how Dell transformed their business.

Dell1

Dell2

Dell

This campaign is a change from traditional celebrity endorsements by its competitors like Lenovo and Acer. SMB owners will definitely have more impact than celebrities (I’m not sure if Saif can tell the difference between an AMD and an Intel, and I’m not sure if Hritik even owns an Acer, so I will naturally trust P. Rejendren and Raman Roy more than Hritik and Saif), but here, rather than the whole campaign and it impact, I want to discuss its tag line – Take Your Own Path:

  • I am quite amused at the irony of this ad which asks me to take my own path by pointing me towards the path chosen by some other business people. If they chose Dell, why should I as well? Am not I supposed to “take my own path” and trust my own judgment rather than theirs?
  • The strategy of using ‘real life heroes’ is a very old one. Some time back HP also ran a campaign featuring Dilip Chhabaria, Karan Johar etc. highlighting how HP helped them succeed. Apple’s “Think Different” campaign was also on the same lines. So my question is: When the ad agency itself could not “take its own path” and come up with something new to advertise its product, how can it expect me to take my own path?

It looks like Enfatico, the ad agency created to handle only Dell’s marketing service, and much criticized (ridiculed rather) for not coming up with anything creative in 9 months even after guzzling $4.5 Billion, was under immense pressure to do something, anything.

And that’s what they did.

Abhinav Bindra for a spectacles ad January 16, 2009

Posted by प्रवीण in Advertising.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
7 comments

He wears specs, and still he won a gold medal in shooting. I just wonder what kind of specs they are. Don’t you?

Abhinav Bindra, after his splendid performance in China Olympics 2008, became a well known face in every urban Indian home (not to say that he is unknown to the rural people, but this post is primarily concerned with him being known to middle/upper-middle class). People thought that companies will be queued up at his house for endorsement deals and he’ll soon be relieving our cricketers of their extra work because of which they sometimes don’t get time even for the game that made them famous. Though that quite didn’t happen, he cracked only one deal with Samsung, to become their brand ambassador for LCD TVs. It’s another story that Samsung almost wasted him in a campaign whose meaning was not clear to most of the audience (see http://www.thump.in/taxonomy/term/166 and http://www.yaxislive.com/abhinav-bindra-samsung-lcd-tv-ad-is-unbeatable for details).

But here I want to bring up another point. When I saw Bindra’s photograph for the first time in newspapers, the first thing that came to my mind was, “Oh, he wears specs, and still he won a gold medal in shooting, wow!” and I’m sure this thought would have come to many people who saw him for the first time. This makes him an ideal candidate to endorse eyeglasses. Just imagine: a lens that is so precise, it can make you the best shooter in the world. This idea would click to many people. Here, unlike the Samsung LCD TV ad, the connection is very clear: a vision improvement tool and the result of the improved vision.

I am not sure why companies like Carl Zeiss, Essilor etc. are not approaching him. Though it’s not public how much Samsung paid him for its campaign, but considering that it was the only offer he got, he shouldn’t be too expensive. Another point worth noting is that these companies sell premium products to upper-middle sections of the society where his face has become very familiar (as discussed earlier), so he’d appeal to 100% of the target audience.

What do you think of this idea? Please cast your vote/comment to indicate.

Neo Sports bleeding toe cricket ad December 16, 2008

Posted by प्रवीण in Advertising, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
2 comments

Neo Sports, a cricket channel too famous for glamorizing violence in its cricket ads was airing the crushed toe ads for the India vs Australia 2008 October/November Test series.

Neo Sports ad

Neo Sports ad

This ad is gross and negetive at so many levels:

  • An injured, bleeding toe is not a very pleasant sight. At best it will give you some nightmares. So most people, after seeing this ad for the first time, will try to throw this image out of their minds and next time onwards avoid looking at this ad, which defeats the whole purpose of advertising.
  • Now coming to the caption, Neo Sports does admit that last year Aussies not only bashed us in the game, they literally ‘beat us to ground’. Not a very sweet memory to bring back to the average Indian cricket fan, for whom this ad is made.
  • Finally the last portion says: “It’s time to return the favour”. So what the ad assumes and spreads is, “Cricket is a game much like kick-boxing where the victory or superiority is not decided by the number of runs or wickets, but by the number of injured legs, fractured hands and broken skulls”. Obviously, gone are the days when cricket was called a “gentleman’s game”!

Nimbus Communications, the company behind Neo Sports, should have considered these points when approving this ad, but looking at the past record of Nimbus, when they released similar negative ads for India-West Indies and India-Sri Lanka series, it appears that they are consciously doing it.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.